Trust architectureThe platform behind a decision you can defend.
15Rock does not make the decision. It structures the evidence, assumptions, trade-offs, and draft artifacts so your team can defend how an answer was produced — to IC, board, client, or compliance.
Six stages. One pipeline. Every claim cited.
15Rock is not a chatbot or a research database. It is a workflow engine — each stage produces a verifiable artifact the next stage builds on.
Source map
Map sources and universe
Claim engine
Map claims to evidence
Workflow engine
Apply your methodology
Draft output
Generate cited workpaper
Reviewer loop
Human validates
Strategy pack
Export shortlist · brief · board pack
- Filings (10-K, 10-Q, 8-K)SEC + global
- Earnings call transcriptsQ1–Q4
- Broker research12 banks
- Internal models & memosprivate workspace
Every source hashed and version-pinned before claim mapping
IC memo · sector primer · board pack
Exportable · Cited · Audit-trailed
- Executive summarycomplete
- Thesis & key claimscomplete
- Evidence appendixcomplete
- Risk registerin-review
Claim engine linked 47 citations
auto · 08:14
J. Singh approved sections 1–3
reviewer · 10:42
Workflow engine regenerated section 4
auto · 11:31
R. Chen exported decision pack
reviewer · 14:20
Six engines. One workflow your team owns.
Source map
Every filing, transcript, broker note, model, and internal document — registered, hashed, and verified before it can be cited.
- Document & spreadsheet ingest
- Granular workspace permissions
- Provenance and version pinning
- Private workspace ingest
Claim engine
Each assertion in a draft is mapped to the source span it came from. Unsupported claims surface before review.
- Claim-level evidence linking
- Page and timestamp citation
- Contradiction detection
- Confidence and assumption markers
Workflow engine
Your IC framework, scoring rubric, and red-flag library run as a repeatable workflow — same questions, same depth, every diligence.
- Configurable methodology
- Red-flag library
- IC scoring rubrics
- Sector-specific templates
Reviewer loop
Analyst review at the claim level. Approve, flag, or rewrite — every action recorded against the evidence.
- Claim-by-claim sign-off
- Human decision sign-off
- Comment threads on evidence
- Role-based approval gates
Decision pack
Decision-ready output — memo, brief, board pack — every paragraph traceable to its source.
- IC memo + risk register
- Sector primer + peer set
- Board pack + appendix
- PDF, DOCX, structured JSON
Audit trail
Every source ingestion, claim mapping, reviewer action, and export — captured and exportable with the artifact.
- Tamper-evident log
- Reviewer attribution
- Version history & source diffs
- Compliance-ready export
Every claim has a source. Every source has an audit trail.
What a 15Rock pipeline looks like from ingestion through to the exported decision pack.
Ingest sources
Public data, private overlays, internal models, transcripts, regulatory data — every input is registered, hashed, and verified before it can be cited.
- BloombergNEF — Steel 2030Q3 2025
- IEA WEO 2025Oct 2025
- Form 10-K (12 filings)FY24
- Internal model — capex base casev3.2
- Earnings transcripts (8)Q1–Q3
5 of 5 sources verified · ready for claim mapping
Map claims to evidence
Every assertion in a draft is linked back to the source span it came from. Unsupported claims are flagged before they reach a reviewer.
Steel-sector capex is set to rise 18% YoY through 2027, driven by green-premium product lines.
Conf · high- BNEF Steel 2030[p.42]“Greenfield DRI-EAF capex commitments up 18.4% YoY, concentrated in EU and India.”
- ArcelorMittal 10-K[FY24]“Capex guidance raised to $4.5–5.0B, weighted to decarb.”
- IEA WEO 2025[ch.6]“Green-premium product demand grows at 11% CAGR through 2030.”
Apply your methodology
Your scoring rubric, peer logic, value-creation lens, and deliverable standard run as a workflow — not a prompt. Same questions, same depth, every engagement.
| Claim | Source | Value | Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market growth | BNEF + IEA | +11% CAGR | Conf · high |
| Capex trajectory | 10-K filings | +18% YoY | Conf · high |
| Margin durability | Broker consensus | Mixed | Conf · medium |
| Regulatory tail risk | EU CBAM | Elevated | Conf · medium |
Generate the draft
Shortlist, Value Scan, benchmark, sector note, or board pack — drafted with every claim citation-linked. No fabrication, no untraceable paragraphs.
Value Scan — Project Aurora
Exportable · Cited · Audit-trailed
- Executive summarycomplete
- Shortlist rationale & key claims (12)complete
- Evidence appendix (47 citations)complete
- Risk registerin-review
- Reviewer sign-offpending
Human validates
Your analysts review claim-by-claim. Approve, flag, or rewrite — every action is recorded against the underlying evidence span.
- Approved
J. Singh
Senior Analyst
“Capex thesis well-supported — green-premium evidence is the strongest.”
- Flagged
M. Patel
Sector Lead
“Margin durability claim needs a second broker source.”
- Pending
R. Chen
Investment Committee
Export the artifact
Decision-ready output: shortlist, brief, benchmark, or board pack — every paragraph traceable to its source. The audit trail ships with the file.
Claim engine linked 47 citations to 12 claims
08:14 · automated
J. Singh approved sections 1–3
10:42 · reviewer
M. Patel flagged margin durability for re-evidence
11:08 · reviewer
Workflow engine regenerated section 4 with new source
11:31 · automated
R. Chen exported decision pack (PDF + DOCX)
14:20 · reviewer
One vocabulary across the whole platform
Six terms you'll see across the product. Each maps to a concrete artifact, not a marketing concept.
Source map
Every trusted input — public data, private overlays, internal models, regulatory data — registered and verified before it can be cited.
Claim engine
Maps each assertion in a draft to the evidence span it came from. Unsupported claims surface before review.
Workflow engine
Your methodology — scoring rubric, peer logic, value-creation lens, and deliverable standard — running as a repeatable workflow, not a prompt.
Reviewer loop
Analyst review at the claim level. Approve, flag, or rewrite — every action recorded against the evidence.
Strategy pack
The output: shortlist, Value Scan, benchmark, brief, or board pack — every paragraph traceable to its source.
Audit trail
Every source ingestion, claim mapping, reviewer action, and export — captured and exportable with the artifact.
Source-level provenance, claim-level citations, reviewer sign-off.
15Rock does not publish vendor connector counts or hard infrastructure SLAs. The promise is process: how a source becomes a cited claim, and how that claim gets reviewed before it ships.
Works from the sources you provide.
No direct CRM, HRIS, or BI integrations are assumed. Provide exports your team already produces.
Built for institutional trust
Security & Compliance
Compliance
- Enterprise security standards
- Regular security audits
- Data privacy controls
- Compliance-ready architecture
Data Protection
- 256-bit encryption
- Data residency options
- Regular security audits
- Penetration testing
Access Control
- SSO/SAML support
- Multi-factor authentication
- Role-based permissions
- Audit logging
What procurement, legal, and compliance ask first
Eight questions buyers consistently bring to vendor review. Detailed answers, sub-processor lists, and security reports available under NDA.
Experience the platform
See how investment and advisory teams turn their own sources into decision-ready, fully-cited workpapers — every claim traceable to where it came from.
Start small
Most teams begin with one workflow, one source set, and one output.